9C – Trust Cannot Be Automated: Building Enduring International Partnerships
Abstract:
As artificial intelligence accelerates across global higher education, one question grows more urgent and more human:
what does it actually take to build international partnerships that last? This roundtable brings together Hitotsubashi
University (Japan), Kyung Hee University (South Korea), and the University at Buffalo, State University of New York
(USA) not to present answers, but to open a genuinely collegial conversation. Drawing on active bilateral frameworks,
undergraduate mobility initiatives, combined degree pathways, and early assurance programs across East Asia and
North America, our institutions offer three distinct yet complementary perspectives on a shared conviction: technology
can accelerate partnership, but it cannot generate the trust, reciprocity, and sustained institutional commitment that make
partnerships endure.Four anchoring questions will guide our dialogue: How do we build trust across cultures in an AImediated
world? What structures best support students across the full arc of their international journey? How do
institutions sustain partnership commitment when priorities shift? And how do we transform disparities in research
capacity from a source of imbalance into a foundation for mutual scholarly growth and shared purpose? Participants are
warmly invited to bring their own experiences into the room. Attendees will leave with practical insights, meaningful peer
connections, and a sharper framework for designing international partnerships that are not merely efficient but enduringly
human.
Learning objectives:
- Articulate the human foundations of trust, reciprocity, and institutional commitment that distinguish enduring
international partnerships from transactional ones in an AI-mediated landscape.
- Compare cross-cultural approaches to partnership-building across East Asian and North American contexts,
drawing on active bilateral frameworks among Hitotsubashi University, Kyung Hee University, and the University at
Buffalo.
- Evaluate structural models including undergraduate mobility initiatives, combined degree pathways, and early
assurance programs that support students across the full arc of their international journey.
- Identify strategies for sustaining institutional partnership commitment through leadership transitions and shifting
priorities.
- Develop a practical, peer-informed framework for designing international partnerships that leverage technological
acceleration without sacrificing the relational and cultural intelligence that technology cannot replicate.
Target audience:
International partnership officers, mobility coordinators, senior academic and administrative leaders, and professionals
designing pathway or combined degree programs;particularly those navigating institutional strategy, cross-cultural
relationship management, and AI integration in global higher education.
10B – Beyond the Algorithm: Human-Centered Governance and the Future of Transnational Education in Asia-Pacific
Abstract:
As transnational education (TNE) expands across the Asia-Pacific, institutions face mounting pressure to ensure that
diverse program models remain academically rigorous, culturally responsive, and institutionally coherent. Few settings
illustrate this challenge more vividly than Singapore Institute of Management Global Education (SIMGE), a single campus
hosting degree programs from universities across the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and France,
each operating within its own governance framework, curricular architecture, and quality assurance expectations. This
panel draws on the partnership between the University at Buffalo, The State University of New York and SIMGE, now
spanning more than two decades, as an anchor case study to examine how one institution navigates the complexity of
hosting multiple higher education systems simultaneously. Presenters will explore how institutional trust, adaptive
governance, and curriculum alignment sustain high-quality program delivery across vastly different educational cultures.
Moving beyond institutional promotion, the session offers comparative analysis of structural differences among TNE
models, including delivery formats, faculty engagement, student mobility pathways, and regulatory compliance, and
identifies transferable strategies for institutions designing or scaling partnerships in the region. In an era where AI is
reshaping program delivery, the human dimensions of partnership, namely relationship, adaptability, and mutual
accountability, remain the irreplaceable foundation of sustainable TNE.
Learning objectives:
- Examine how SIMGE operationalizes multiple TNE models across five countries within a single institutional
platform, including the governance structures that sustain this approach.
- Analyze curricular architecture, faculty engagement, and quality assurance mechanisms across diverse national
education systems through comparative institutional analysis.
- Draw on the University at Buffalo and SIMGE partnership as a longitudinal case study of relationship-driven
program delivery in Southeast Asia.
- Identify practical strategies for managing a diverse TNE portfolio, including partnership design and risk mitigation.
- Recognize the foundational role of human-centered practices; trust, responsiveness, and adaptability in sustaining
TNE success amid rapid technological change.
Target audience:
International education professionals in partnership development, TNE governance, program design, and institutional
strategy, particularly those evaluating Asia-Pacific engagement, as well as quality assurance officers and senior
administrators with interests in transnational education innovation.